The party conference season is over at last. Speeches ranged across the whole spectrum of hypocrisy – like every year. I managed to interview leading politicians, and Liberal Democrats, about the hottest topic: free speech.
Chris Philp, Conservative: We have put free speech in the heart of our manifesto. As soon as we get back into power, as we will, we will hand this issue to a commission of civil servants, whose dedication to action is well understood. Remember, it is the Conservatives who promised a British Bill of Rights which set out, before we dropped it, that “free speech is something judges should think about taking into account; if that’s not too much trouble”.
And let me say, if the new commission let me say it, that it joins our existing our manifesto pledges, on lowering taxes, on deregulation and on personal freedom, which we have always had. And I have no doubt that we will be as successful in this as we were in implementing those pledges in the 14 years we were last in power.”
Sinn Féin (anon, masked): “We are committed, and we should all be committed, to free speech by the Nationalist community – and we will kill anyone who questions that.”
Jones, Plaid Cymru: “Rwy’n esgus egluro yn yr hen iaith, ond mewn gwirionedd, does gen i ddim syniad beth mae’r synau sy’n dod o fy ngenau yn ei olygu mewn gwirionedd.”
David Paulden, Green: “It is vital that the people should be able to hear every side of our message. The wealthy and educated have too long dominated the conversation by spreading blatant facts and logic, which we cannot tolerate: those who spread disagreement with us must no longer be allowed to dominate the conversation, or indeed to be part of it. We have gained acceptance for silencing those who deny that a man can be a woman on Thursdays, or who deny that climate change means Brighton will be underwater by Friday week. We will embed in the national consciousness our fundamental messages, that War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.”
Ed Davey, Liberal Democrat: “To show my commitment to free, properly regulated speech, I skied to the Conference, which is harder than in looks, in Brighton! You can’t say that Liberal Democrats aren’t fully in support of free speech – because under our Online Harms Bill, you will be locked up if you do! We will safeguard free expression – and protection against online harms, such as free expression – ensuring online regulation works for the right people like us, not against them.
Our name tells you who we are – liberal with facts, and democrat in the same sense! Now, watch me on this skateboard! Ow…”
Stella Creasy, Labour: “If free speech means anything, it means that we must stop the voices that prevent people being heard. Labour has tried to get its voice across but entrenched interests force themselves across that message. When we say that we want the economy to grow, we cannot then be contradicted by far-right voices saying that everything we have done is making it worse. We must be free to say we speak for the working man, without hearing from the far-right that we are causing unemployment, and punishing those few remaining who do work.
Let us be clear: if the far-right, and I mean anyone who disagrees with me, are allowed to influence the debate with fact, reason, logic and other far-right disinformation techniques, we will never get back into the European Union and never be able to destroy nationalism, and the nation, at last as we all desire.
Speech is unacceptable which it stops somebody else’s view from being heard, and our view must not be drowned out by being contradicted. If we want to stand up for free speech, we have to stand up for the right of people to say ‘stop – actually, you’re not going to change my mind, this conversation isn’t one I want to continue being part of and how you go on behaving means that I don’t feel that I can’t speak at all.’ We must protect those spaces where people do feel they can have a discussion.
More must be done to tackle far-right ideas and divisive memes, like cricket, beer and black labradors. It is hard enough for the Government to do its job, doing all it is doing to the British people, when malicious forces of the far-right and Russian influencers are suggesting that Andy Burnham is less intelligent than a black labrador – when that has never been proved.
We accept that this is a subject which has caused a lot of debate, and we will stop that debate. The line has to be drawn, between freedom for those of us on the side of good, and restricting dangerous, far-right hate speech by those we detest. The line must be drawn, which is a heavy responsibility that must be taken on by the government on behalf of the people – and we know which people. It is consistent with the principle Labour has always upheld in our vision of the all-encompassing state: everything in the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state.”